Im März 2026 wurde das Forum gehackt. Dabei hatten die Angreifer Zugriff auf die Datenbank und somit Zugriff auf eure Passwörter. Auch wenn das Forum kein Passwort im Klartext speichert, können die Angreifer eure Passwörter knacken. Bitte ändert daher dringend euer Passwort für das Forum. Solltet ihr das gleiche Passwort auch an anderer Stelle verwenden, ändert es bitte unbedingt an allen Stellen!
Much has already been said about the Q value. Unfortunately, it is not possible to read the quality of the transmitted data packets from the transmitter and correctly received data packets at the receiver from the Q value. I would appreciate the following realization in the near future. Other systems can do that already.
Please realize two Q-values.
1. TX-Q for the connection transmitter -> receiver
2. RX-Q for the connection receiver -> transmitter (return channel)
Better would be the exact indication of lost data packets at each receiver antenna during a flight.
Display the transmission quality in "%", "dBm" or "% R". For example, 50 lost data packets / s are regarded as 0% RSSI, and 0 lost data packets / s is 100%
It would be a real improvement!
With these values you can estimate the quality of the transmission and optimize the position of the antennas in the model.
best regards
Bernd
Folgende Benutzer bedankten sich: GeGie, Flugsaurier, sunbeam, oesti, Ba-Nause, Jochen, Eifelblitz, verbindung, STer, G0NZ0 und 14 weitere Personen haben sich bedankt.
there are consistently discussions about the telemetry values A1 / A2 and Q.
In case of dropping values or warnings it's not possible to determine if it's only a problem
of the insignificant back channel or if the problem also exits in the important forward channel.
So I'm sure, you can make many Jeti user happy by expanding the telemetry values, so that it's getting
possible to observe the forward and back channel separately.
